Siteimprove Accessibility
UK SOFTWARE PROFILE
Siteimprove Accessibility
Accessibility governance connecting monitoring, editorial remediation and development workflows.
One product. Different jobs.
Each score uses that category's criteria. Compare products within a category, rather than comparing scores across unrelated tasks.
Pricing & practicalities
Model your total cost ↗Published starting point
Request pricing
Accessibility; specify agents and services · Configured subscription · quote billing
VAT basis not stated
No verified numeric UK rate captured; request domains, pages, PDFs, agents and service allowances with currency/VAT confirmation.
Check current price ↗Consider before choosing
- Expert testing and agents need an explicit commercial scope.
- Automation cannot establish full conformance.
Connected workflows
- WordPress
- Drupal
- VS Code
- Figma
- CI/CD tooling
Confirm the integration's direction, permissions, plan and sync behaviour with the supplier.
BEHIND THE AI CLAIM
AI capabilities
Agents propose CMS corrections and document image descriptions for review.
Documented capabilities
- CMS remediation suggestions
- PDF image alternative-text drafts
Plans, limits & questions
- Confirm agent availability, allowance and supported CMS.
- Human approval and regression testing remain necessary.
Feature-by-feature evidence
Website accessibility monitoring — 20 scored checks
| Capability & demo question | Siteimprove Accessibility90–100/100 documented fit |
|---|---|
Core workflowWhole-site accessibility scanning5.0 points availableAsk in the demoCrawl a representative site section. | ✓ Supported Site-wide monitoring. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowScheduled recurring scans5.0 points availableAsk in the demoSet the next scan and show its coverage. | ✓ Supported Continuous recurring monitoring. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowWCAG-linked findings5.0 points availableAsk in the demoOpen a finding linked to its success criterion. | ✓ Supported WCAG-linked findings. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowIssues shown in page context5.0 points availableAsk in the demoLocate the exact affected element. | ✓ Supported Page-section and issue context. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowIssue prioritisation5.0 points availableAsk in the demoIdentify the next barrier your team should fix. | ✓ Supported Goal and issue prioritisation. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowPDF accessibility checks5.0 points availableAsk in the demoInspect a representative document. | ✓ Supported PDF/document checks. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowProgress over time5.0 points availableAsk in the demoCompare the same site's results across two dates. | ✓ Supported Historical accessibility reporting. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowBrowser-based page checking5.0 points availableAsk in the demoCheck an individual page while viewing it. | ✓ Supported Chrome, Edge, Firefox and Opera extensions. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Core workflowActionable remediation guidance5.0 points availableAsk in the demoShow a fix explanation usable by the responsible editor. | ✓ Supported Remediation guidance. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthHuman-assisted review workflow5.0 points availableAsk in the demoRecord a judgement that automation cannot determine. | ✓ Supported Expert manual results in platform. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthAssigned remediation tasks5.0 points availableAsk in the demoGive a finding an owner and track the work. | ? Not verified Not established by the reviewed official evidence; request a demonstration. 0.0–5.0 / 5.0 points |
Workflow depthRetest a specific correction5.0 points availableAsk in the demoRecheck a fixed issue without relying on an old score. | ✓ Supported Specific page and PDF rechecks. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthRestricted team access5.0 points availableAsk in the demoRestrict a user to the appropriate site or role. | ✓ Supported Custom roles and site restrictions. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthExportable audit evidence5.0 points availableAsk in the demoExport findings for an independent review. | ✓ Supported Excel, PDF and HTML reports. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthCMS or task-system integration5.0 points availableAsk in the demoSend a finding into a supported editing or task workflow. | ✓ Supported WordPress and Drupal workflows. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthAuthenticated-content testing5.0 points availableAsk in the demoShow a documented scan behind a login. | ✓ Supported Authenticated and internal content support. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
Workflow depthDeveloper workflow integration5.0 points availableAsk in the demoRun a documented code or pipeline accessibility check. | ✓ Supported Code checker and CI integration. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
AIAI explanation of a finding5.0 points availableAsk in the demoAsk why an actual finding matters to a user. | ? Not verified Not established by the reviewed official evidence; request a demonstration. 0.0–5.0 / 5.0 points |
AIAI fix suggestions5.0 points availableAsk in the demoGenerate a proposed change for human review. | ✓ Supported CMS Remediation Agent suggestions. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
AIAI alternative-text drafting5.0 points availableAsk in the demoDraft image alternative text and review its purpose in context. | ✓ Supported PDF Remediation Agent image descriptions. 5.0 / 5.0 pointsEvidence ↗ |
“Not verified” means the recorded evidence does not settle this specific check. It does not mean the feature is absent. Read the scoring method.